Verdict: Kakha Okriashvili’s statement is FALSE.


Kakha Okriashvili tries to use the comparison in his statement to illustrate the burden of people’s obligation toward banks. However, Mr Okriashvili’s fact is inaccurate. As of 2017, the total interest rate income of commercial banks reached GEL 2.8 billion whilst their income received from fines and commissions was GEL 446 million which is seven times less as compared to the income received from interest rates.

Another part of Kakha Okriashvili’s statement where he makes emphasis on the total volume of negative, inactive and overdue loans is also incorrect. Grouping together or adding up negative, inactive and overdue loans is not a proper approach to use. The category of negative loans[1]

encompasses inactive loans but not entirely. In regard to overdue loans, this category, as opposed to negative and inactive loans, is not categorised on the basis of loan risks. Therefore, it is inappropriate to bring them into the discussion together with the volume of negative and inactive loans.

If we analyse the volumes of the aforementioned loans separately in order to see whether or not their burden upon the population has indeed increased, we will see that the share of overdue as well as negative and inactive loans as a part of the total amount of loans decreased in 2017.


Georgian Dream member, Kakha Okriashvili, MP, in his speech before the Parliament of Georgia spoke about the excessive debt owed by the population to commercial banks and stated that bank income received from fines and commissions was almost equal to bank income from interest rates whilst the total volume of inactive, overdue and negative loans constitutes GEL 1.3 billion.

In his statement Mr Okriashvili refers to commercial bank income. This income is comprised of interest rate and non-interest rate income. Interest rate income represents those funds which commercial banks receive as interest rates from loans they issue and service they provide to securities. On the other hand, funds generated from fines, penalty interests and service commissions are incorporated into the category of non-interest rate income.

In accordance with the information of the National Bank of Georgia, the income of commercial banks in Georgia increased annually in the period of 2012-2017 together with the growth of loan portfolios. In the course of these six years, funds generated by commercial banks doubled:  at the beginning of the accounting period their income was GEL 1.7 billion whilst this figure peaked in 2017 and reached GEL 3.6 billion. In the period of 2012-2017, in light of increasing total income, the absolute amount of income received from service commissions and fines as well as from interest rates also grew proportionally and at a constant rate. By the end of 2017, commercial bank interest rate income reached GEL 2.8 billion whilst funds generated from fines and commissions amounted to GEL 446 million which is seven times less as compared to the interest rate income. For each year of the accounting period, the amount of funds received from fines and commissions was at least six times less as compared to the income from interest rates.

Graph 1:

Commercial Bank Income in 2012-2017 (GEL million, %)

ოკრია  Source: National Bank of Georgia

Loan portfolios issued by commercial banks are divided between standard and negative risk categories. In turn, loans with a negative status include inactive loans as one of their components.

The volume of loans issued by banks increased annually in the accounting period. This figure reached GEL 22.3 billion in 2017 which is 2.5 times more as compared to 2012. The share of loans with a negative status in the total loan portfolio was at its lowest in 2017 and equalled 11%. Of importance is that in the last six years, the amount of negative loans decreased for the first time in 2017 and constituted GEL 2.45 billion. Of this amount, the share of inactive loans equals GEL 1.3 billion.

Table 1:

Categorisation of Loan Portfolio in Terms of Risks (GEL million, %)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Standard Loan 7,441 8,902 11,339 13,840  16,366 19,830
Share in Total Loans 85% 84.90% 87.50% 86.40% 86.6% 89%
Negative Loan 1,292 1,578 1,627 2,173 2,534 2,446
Share in Total Loans 15% 15.10% 12.50% 13.60% 13.4% 11%
Inactive Loan 810 791 988 1,200 1,380  1,337
Share in Total Loan 9% 7.50% 7.60% 7.50% 7.3% 6%
Total Amount of Loans 8,733 10,480  12,966 16,013 18,902 22,276
Source: National Bank of Georgia

In his statement, apart from negative and inactive loans, Kakha Okriashvili also speaks about overdue loans. Of consideration is that this type of grouping is not appropriate because loan categorisation in terms of having a negative or inactive status is a part of their classification based on risks and reflects the assessment/expectation of a borrower’s ability to serve his debts within the agreed time period. At the same time, the amount of overdue loans reflects the situation on the ground. An overdue loan is defined as a loan for which the debtor has not made his scheduled payments (or part of the payments) on the principal amount or the interest for more than 30 days after the date of the agreed payment given in the loan documentation.

Graph 2:

Trend of Changes in Overdue Loans

ოკრია1  Source: National Bank of Georgia

As of April 2018, the total amount of overdue loans in Georgia equals GEL 378 million and constitutes 1.65% of the total amount of loans. As illustrated in the graph, in light of the absolute growth in the amount of overdue loans (which is natural if we take the growth in the total amount of loans into account) the share of overdue loans as a part of the total amount of loans has a clear tendency of decrease.

[1] A commercial bank’s loan portfolio is divided between the standard and negative status loan categories. Negative loans incorporate sub-categories of watch loans and inactive loans. In turn, inactive loans encompass loss loans, sub-standard loans and doubtful loans.