• About Us
    1. Team
    2. Methodology
    3. Privacy Policy
  • Code of Principles
  • Dispute/Correction
  • Project Supporters
  • Contact
ქართული Azərbaycan հայերեն Русский

Factcheck.ge

Check your Fact
  • Elections 2024 - Crisis
  • Persons
  • Verdicts
    • True
    • Mostly True
    • Half True
    • Mostly False
    • False
    • Lie
    • Manipulation
    • Fake News
    • Without verdict
    • Half Flip
    • Full Flop
    • პოზიცია ნაწილობრივ შეცვალა
    • Satire
    • FactCheck Newspaper
  • Regions
  • Fake News
    • Climate Change
    • როგორ არ მოვტყუვდეთ?
  • Topics
    • Economy
    • Justice
    • Politics
    • Education
    • Health Care
  • Politics
    • Ukraine
    • დაპირებები
    • Election 2021
    • Elections 2017
    • 2016 Parliamentary Elections
    • Elections 2014
    • Elections 2013
    • COVID-19
    • COVID Vaccine
    • Fact-Meter TV
State Agencies which Withhold Public Information and Violate Requirements of the Law

State Agencies which Withhold Public Information and Violate Requirements of the Law

10/09/2018
FactCheck Newspaper
FactCheck Newspaper
Facebook Linkedin Twitter Print
Representatives of the Government of Georgia often talk about progress in regard to the transparency of public agencies. In September 2017, Georgia became the Open Governance Programme (OGP) chair country which is undoubtedly welcoming. However, as FactCheck’s experience – and not only FactCheck’s – shows, simple issues such as obtaining public information may oftentimes become a problem for citizens. Even though state accountability towards its citizens and transparency are one of the OGP’s core key components, it is not uncommon for FactCheck’s requests for public information to remain wholly unanswered. FactCheck decided to bring specific facts to its readers vis-à-vis a state agency, without any reason, not providing the public information we requested. In accordance with Article 40 of the General Administrative Code of Georgia, public agencies have the obligation to release public information immediately or no later than ten days if releasing the information requires the processing of different data. Unfortunately, it is a very rare occurrence for us here at FactCheck to receive information immediately. In addition, the ten-day legal requirement is violated quite frequently. Moreover, there are public agencies which in some instances have not provided our requested public information in ten months, let alone ten days. Of note is that we have not received an argumentative refusal as to why we do not receive an answer and, moreover, in most cases it is very difficult to obtain a telephone contact as well. All the aforementioned constitutes a clear and blatant violation of the law. In FactCheck’s experience, one of the least transparent agencies is the Ministry of Justice and its subordinate bodies. Several examples:  On 15 February 2018, FactCheck addressed the Ministry of Justice with a request for public information. We have not yet received an answer. Apart from that, on 7 May 2018 we addressed the Staff of the Government of Georgia with a request for public information. The Staff of the Government of Georgia, pursuant to Article 80 of the General Administrative Code, sent our request to the ministries. The Minister of Justice has not provided that information which was requested with the aforementioned letter. Of necessary note is Ministry of Justice’s Legal Entity of the Public Law (LEPL) the National Bureau of Enforcement which has not replied to our letter of 18 April 2018 requesting public information (our questions were about the number of debtors registered in the Debt Registry). We were periodically contacting the Bureau and inquiring as to the reasons for the delays in receiving an answer. Initially, we were told to wait and were denied any opportunity to talk with a person responsible for release of this public information. After some time, the Bureau stopped answering FactCheck’s telephone calls. The National Agency of Public Registry is another LEPL of the Ministry of Justice which ignores FactCheck’s requests for public information. In a letter we asked for information about the number of requests submitted by Georgian and foreign nationals as well as by commercial banks and microfinance organisations in the period of 16 June to August 2017 to register changes in the designated usage of land plots. We further inquired how many requests had been satisfied and how many of them had been requested and what the state of “current affairs” looked like. In response, the Agency asked for ten days to process the information. However, ten months have passed since that day and FactCheck’s question still remains unanswered. FactCheck submitted a request to the Ministry of Finance as early as November 2017 asking for information about the labour remuneration, bonuses and salary supplements for deputy ministers. Initially, in a telephone conversation, the Ministry said that answers to our questions were being processed. Afterwards, a person responsible for the release of public information told us bluntly that his superior directed him to not answer our questions. FactCheck sent another letter with the same request for public information on 8 June 2018 and, not unexpectedly, there has been no response as well. On 16 March 2018, FactCheck sent another letter to the Ministry of Finance asking for the Minister’s decree determining the authority of the first deputy minister. Legally, there should have been an immediate reply but, in fact, we received no reply from the Ministry. During our attempt to inquire further into the situation, we were asked to wait for 15 minutes so that they could find our letter. However, after that they never answer our telephone calls. On 16 March 2018, FactCheck sent a letter to the Ministry of Finance’s LEPL Revenue Service requesting public information. We have not yet received a reply and our telephone calls are repetitively answered that the “information is being processed.” For FactCheck’s work, requesting public information from state agencies is of paramount importance. Therefore, we will remain active in this regard and continue to bring cases similar to these aforementioned facts to the attention of our readers.
Tags:
უგულავა
სალომე ჩიმაკაძე
Beka Natsvlishvili
Constitutional Court of Georgia
the Estonian model
All.ge
ლაგოდეხი
შეაჩერე კორუფცია
ბურჯი
კონსტანტინე ქავთარაძე
არჩევნები 2017
Davit Kutidze
Davit Kutidze

All Articles

  • “The profits of Georgian banks increased 23-fold in 2012-2024, rising from GEL 134 million to GEL 3.1 billion. Return on capital ranged between 30% and 40%.”

    “The profits of Georgian banks increased...

    Without verdict
    The verification of the application can not be evaluated
  • Export-Import Trends of Agricultural Products

    Export-Import Trends of Agricultural Pro...

    FactCheck Newspaper
    FactCheck Newspaper
  • : “Emigrants send home USD 3.3 billion annually – about a third of the national budget – this is how the country sustains itself.”

    : “Emigrants send home USD 3.3 billion a...

    Mostly True
    The application is accurate, but requires additional information and/or definition
IFCN Verification
EFCSN
Public Information Base
Factcheck.ge
European GMF Netherland USAID

Phone: +(995 32) 2 22 29 13

Email: [email protected]

Factcheck.ge
Factcheck.ge

The views and opinions expressed on this website belong to Factcheck.ge and are not the views and opinions of project support organizations.

Factcheck.ge

© 2025 | Privacy Policy