Resume: A country’s credit rating gives investors information about risk factors associated with investments in certain countries as well as the reliability of these countries. Dozens of agencies publish credit ratings although Standard & Poor’s(S&P), Moody’s and Fitchare the most influential and famous among them. Each credit rating agency employs its own methodology, although basic indicators are the same and include economic indicators as well as a country’s domestic and foreign policies, regional processes and the environment.
Fitch gave Georgia a BB stable outlook assessment on 22 February 2019, Standard & Poor gave the same assessment on 10 October 2019 and Moody’s gave Georgia a Ba2 stable outlook assessment on 11 September 2018. The levels of Georgia’s assessments are by and large the same. Therefore, based on the aforementioned companies’ assessments, there are certain speculative risks in the Georgian economy. In all three cases, according to Ivane Machavariani’s statement, Georgia needs to move two positions upward to reach the investment grade which would put us in the Baa3 category in the case of Moody’s and the BBB- categories in the cases of Fitch and S&P.
Analysis
The Minister of Finance of Georgia, Ivane Machavariani, made a statement in regard to the end of the International Monetary Fund’s review mission to Georgia. According to Mr Machavariani, the goals of the ongoing programme in Georgia have been successfully reached. The Minister of Finance stated: “Since 2017, all three rating agencies (Moody’s, Fitch and S&P Global) have upgraded our credit rating and we are already two steps away from the investment grade.”
Countries compete in the world’s economy to attract foreign capital. Developing or less developed nations, which have their own limited resources, are particularly dependent upon foreign capital. In turn, creditors and investors make their choices by taking into account the rate of return and stability. In other words, they make calculations vis-à-vis possible profits and risks. The lower the risks (higher reliability), the lower the rate of return for the creditor or investor of the capital in exchange for which he is ready to invest his money in the country.
A country’s credit rating gives investors information about risk factors associated with investments in certain countries as well as the reliability of these countries. Dozens of agencies publish credit ratings although Standard & Poor’s(S&P), Moody’s and Fitchare the most influential and famous among them. Each credit rating agency employs its own methodology, although the basic indicators are the same and include economic indicators as well as a country’s domestic and foreign policies, regional processes and the environment.
Standard & Poor and Fitch have similar assessment systems: AAA is the highest assessment in their system which is followed by AA+, AA,AA-, above average A+, A,A-, below average BBB+, BBB, BBB-, non-investment grade speculative BB+, BB, BB-, speculative B+, B, B-, highly risky, on the verge of bankruptcy CC and Default D. Moody’s assessment is also similar but instead of +/- it uses numerals: Aaa, Aa1, Aa2, Aa3, A1, A2, A3, Baa1, Baa2, Baa4, Ba1, Ba2, Ba3, B1, B2, B3, Caa1, Caa2, Caa3, Ca, C. The assessment positions are in turn divided into investment grade and non-investment grade. Table 1 shows the economic interpretation of the aforementioned assessments.
Table 1: Assessments of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch and Interpretation of the Assessments
Moody's |
S&P |
FITCH |
|
Investment Grade |
|||
Aaa |
AAA |
AAA |
The best investment environment, reliable and stable |
Aa1 |
AA+ |
AA+ |
Good investment environment, higher risk than AAA |
Aa2 |
AA |
AA |
|
Aa3 |
AA- |
AA- |
|
A1 |
A+ |
A+ |
Economic situation can affect the debtor’s solvency |
A2 |
A |
A |
|
A3 |
A- |
A- |
|
baa1 |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
Medium investment environment which is satisfactory at the moment |
Baa2 |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
|
Baa3 |
BBB- |
BBB- |
|
Non-investment Grade |
|||
Ba1 |
BB+ |
BB+ |
There are speculative risks in the economy |
Ba2 |
BB |
BB |
|
Ba3 |
BB- |
BB- |
|
B1 |
B+ |
B+ |
Financial situation varies noticeably |
B2 |
B |
B |
|
B3 |
B- |
B- |
|
Caa1 |
CCC+ |
CCC |
Highly vulnerable and very speculative environment |
Caa2 |
CCC |
||
Caa3 |
CCC- |
||
Ca |
CC |
CC |
On the verge of bankruptcy |
C |
C |
||
C |
D |
D |
Default |
/ |
Fitch gave Georgia a BB stable outlook assessment on 22 February 2019, Standard & Poor gave the same assessment on 10 October 2019 and Moody’s gave Georgia a Ba2 stable outlook assessment on 11 September 2018. The levels of Georgia’s assessments are by and large the same. Therefore, based on the aforementioned companies’ assessments, there are certain speculative risks in the Georgian economy. In all three cases, according to Ivane Machavariani’s statement, Georgia needs to move two positions upward to reach the investment grade which would put us in the Baa3 category in the case of Moody’s and the BBB- categories in the cases of Fitch and S&P.
Table 2: Georgia’s Assessment Dynamic in 2005-2019
Fitch |
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) |
Moody's |
||||||
Date |
Rating |
Outlook |
Date |
Rating |
Outlook |
Date |
Rating |
Outlook |
22.02.2019 |
BB |
Stable |
11.10.2019 |
BB |
Stable |
11.09.2017 |
Ba2 |
Stable |
16.03.2018 |
BB- |
Positive |
12.04.2019 |
BB- |
Positive |
11.03.2016 |
Ba3 |
Stable |
20.04.2015 |
BB- |
Stable |
22.11.2011 |
BB- |
Stable |
22.08.2014 |
Ba3 |
Positive |
17.10.2014 |
BB- |
Positive |
29.03.2011 |
B+ |
Positive |
06.10.2010 |
Ba3 |
Stable |
15.12.2011 |
BB- |
Stable |
12.04.2010 |
B+ |
Stable |
N/A |
||
03.03.2011 |
B+ |
Positive |
25.09.2008 |
B |
Stable |
|||
26.08.2009 |
B+ |
Stable |
08.08.2008 |
B |
Negative |
|||
07.04.2009 |
B+ |
Negative |
05.05.2008 |
B+ |
Stable |
|||
08.08.2008 |
B+ |
Negative |
08.10.2007 |
B+ |
Positive |
|||
18.07.2007 |
BB- |
Stable |
21.11.2006 |
B+ |
Stable |
|||
N/A |
06.12.2005 |
B+ |
Positive |