among the 43 countries of Europe.”
On 13 January 2015, whilst giving a speech at the opening ceremony of the Georgia-Estonia Business Forum, the Prime Minister repeated the same statement.FactCheck
again took interest in Georgia’s Economic Freedom Index and researched additional details about it.
Founded in 1973, the Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute. Its specific goal is to conduct qualified research on the main economic and political issues of the day for its target audiences (congress representatives, media, executive organs, etc.).For 19 years, since Georgia’s Economic Freedom Index was first calculated, its score has improved by 28 points (it reached the maximum in 2014) which shows the third best progress of participating countries. The reason for this growth has mainly been the improving of the regulation system and the openness of the market. Moreover, important reforms have been carried out in trade liberalisation, the privatisation sphere, etc. In 2012, Georgia ranked 34th among 178 countries whilst it was promoted to the 21st
place in 2013.The results of the Index’s research are based on information acquired a year to a year-and-a-half previous to the calculation. The 2014 data reflects the situation of the second part of 2012 and the first half of 2013 whilst the 2013 Index pictures the situation of the second part of 2011 and first part of 2012. We can say that progressing from the 34th place to the 21st
in 2013 is not the result of the new government’s efforts. Moreover, even though Georgia’s score in the Economic Freedom Index increased in the 2014 survey, it downgraded by one place in the ranking which means that other countries improved their economic freedom criteria to a greater degree.The Heritage Foundation prepared a separate report about Georgia’s Economic Freedom Index in 2014. According to the information on page 1 of this report, Georgia received 72.6 points out of 100 in the 2014 Economic Freedom Index. With this Index rating, it ranks 22nd in the world and 12th
in Europe. This information matches that voiced by the Prime Minister.
According to the same report, the 2014 Economic Freedom Index (72.6 points) is 0.4 of a point higher than last year’s Index. As for the categories themselves, Georgia improved not in six but in five out of ten. The country regressed significantly in terms of private property freedom, underlined by the Prime Minister, and downgraded from 45 points to 40.
Economic Freedom Index ScoresSource: Heritage Foundation
According to the above table, the property rights index degraded by five as compared to the previous year whilst the public finance management index remained the same.
Moreover, it should be considered that success in the Index is reflected not in the component scores but in the position of the country and its annual progress. In terms of this, Georgia downgraded in eight out of ten components in the 2014 Index. Georgia improved only in two components: monetary freedom and investment freedom.
Table 2 shows Georgia’s positions by component in 2013 and 2014 among 178 countries.
Georgia’s Ranking by Component
|Public Finance Management
|Freedom From Corruption
For additional information, we reviewed the 2013 data together with that of 2014.
Georgia’s Economic Freedom Index Scores, 2003-2014Source: Heritage Foundation
Table 3 shows that Georgia’s Economic Freedom Index was increasing from 2003 to 2005 and decreased by 1.8 in 2005. The Index was on the increase again from 2006 to 2012 but decreased in 2012 by one point as compared to 2011. In 2013, the Economic Freedom Index increases again by 2.8 points and keeps increasing up to 2014.
As for other countries, Hong Kong ranks first in the Economic Freedom Index with 90.1 points, Singapore is second (89.4), Australia – third (82.0), Switzerland – fourth (81.6) and New Zealand – fifth (81.2).
Conclusion In the process of verifying the Prime Minister’s statement, it turned out that according to the Heritage Foundation report, Georgia received 72.6 points out of 100 in the 2014 Economic Freedom Index. With this score, it ranks 22nd in the world and 12th
in Europe although it downgraded by one position as compared to 2013. By its ranking, Georgia lagged behind other countries in eight out of ten components which means that other countries are carrying out their reforms faster or more effectively and are more successful in enhancing the quality of their economic freedom.
Moreover, according to the information in the same report, Georgia’s 2014 Economic Freedom Index score (72.6) is more than last year’s score by 0.4 of a point. However, five and not six components have improved.
Mr Gharibashvili describes the factual data more or less accurately; however, he emphasises not the position of Georgia with respect to the other countries but the scores of the Index components when stating that Georgia has improved in six out of ten components. Such a comparison is not enough because the main aim of the Economic Freedom Index is to compare countries by economic freedom. Looking at the 2014 data, we can say that the Government of Georgia has been unsuccessful in conducting a policy oriented on economic freedom as since 2013, we have lagged behind other countries by one place.Therefore, FactCheck concludes that Mr Gharibashvili’s statement is HALF TRUE.
Editor’s note: The initial version of this article, under the authorship of FactCheck analyst, Nutsa Tokhadze, was published on 30 June 2014. As noted above, on 13 January 2015, the Prime Minister mentioned the results of the survey conducted by the Heritage Foundation for the second time and repeated the statement he made last year. After the consequent statement, FactCheck returned to the issue. The research showed that the initial version of our article did not analyse the components of the survey and Georgia’s results in each of them thoroughly enough. Because of this, we studied the issue additionally and updated the article. Moreover, based upon the information acquired from the analysis of the research components, FactCheck’s verdict has been modified as well, assessing Irakli Gharibashvili’s statement as HALF TRUE instead of MOSTLY TRUE.